Today, talking about sub clocks means pointing directly to a category of timepieces that is normally employed for even ten percent of its possible.
What good is it to possess the best, which for him to dive to over 1,000 meters of depth would be as simple as "drinking a glass of water", if the person has secured his wrist to the max following a dip and a few strokes, return immediately to couch under the umbrella?
If this is their principal use it is merely the fault of old habits at least as much as the introduction of the so-called divers of this modern age that dates back into the middle of the previous century.
The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three years later, in 1953, Blancpain devised the Fifty Fathoms, one of the most iconic timepieces the category can boast, has been tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to challenge the depths of their well-identified abysses in "The Silent World", a famous documentary -movie also winner of an Oscar award.
Continuing, I feel that even non-fans will remember well one of the very first Rolex Submariner appear several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the movie Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied into his wrist turned into a legend. It was a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to know each other with no crown protector shoulders, imitated a bit by everybody.
These are just a couple of the first cases that show - fiction or fact - for over fifty years, the press - driven by the watch industry - determined the diver watches should be the very first to personify the idea of man-adventure. Perhaps it's also from this day that the manufacturers in regards to describing their models started to use the term: "suitable for any occasion".
The 007 change, unfortunately also the mythical "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all the mechanisms of the most well-known spy in the world, and clearly also the opinion whose role has been played with the Omega Seamaster for many years.
But beyond their real use within this large family whose roots would simply have to deal with "hard even greater than steel", today there are also versions so bejeweled to dread even once you have to wash the hands.
But a true diver's watch has normally always had a whole lot to say technically speaking. Let us just mention the features and constructive philosophies of these references.
I've a long-standing friend who's an expert diver and who, throughout his diving in the Persian Gulf, makes 100 percent of his diving watch - like that valve for the escape of gaseous mixtures that are breathed at large depths.
A True wrist sub must be able to guarantee these performances:
Fantastic visibility throughout the dip
A protection against magnetic fields superior to the norm
Resistance to salt and impact water
Accurate verification of the operation of the system that reports that the dive time
An in-depth test of the efficiency of its motion, either mechanical or quartz
But the tests didn't end here: now professional diving watches must adhere to specific rules like the ones described by ISO 6425.
For a common mortal use, what we know is the best, the best sub could be in the end a watchable to provide attributes much milder and easier to manage.
I recall this in order to only immerse the surface in maximum security, a timepiece ought to be certified to withstand a pressure of at least 5 ATM (about 50 meters), which seems to be redundant, but this isn't so when it is done a banal swim at the sea. It'd be better to prevent diving, especially if ours could not even rely to a screw-on crown, better still if secure on the sides from the classic two shoulders.
Along with the safety on the watertight status of this underwater timepieces?
Precisely for those who'd use them for professional purposes the ideal would be to have the ability to rely upon a system that visually signals on the dial in case the crown isn't completely screwed, as well as the watch is consequently in a blatant condition of non-security.
Sadly, this really is the primary reason why even an abyssal super more info dip watch may need to be rushed to a service center, before seawater entering risks virtually any mechanism forever. This function already exists, but on hardly any versions, which honestly I do not understand why.
You may have worn your diving diver's watch in your wrist to go to the sea and as a result, after adjusting the moment, have left to twist the crown snugly. It is the most frequent case.
Suggestion - When you've worn the costume decide on the fly : either leave your diver someplace safe or obligatorily make a final but fundamental check on the trimming of the winding crown.
Now that we've seen a bit 'of problems related to the time that has to satisfy with the water, and given the necessary advice, I reveal you that - so far - are for me the best dive watches.
They are not many: I have divided them into two classes. The sequence in which they appear doesn't signify any ranking.